Governor Newsom allocated $0 for Prop 36 in the 2026-27 Budget

70% Voted Yes.
$0 Funded.

Californians demanded safer communities and treatment for addiction. The Governor is blocking the will of the people. Demand he fund the mandate.

Estimated Annual Cost of Retail Theft

$0

Source: National Retail Federation

A coalition of mayors, district attorneys, retailers, and victim advocates

CA District Attorneys AssociationCA Retailers AssociationCA Hispanic ChambersAsians Unite
0%

of California voters approved Prop 36

A supermajority mandate transcending partisan lines

$0

allocated by Governor Newsom

Zero dollars in the 2026-27 state budget

$0M

needed for implementation

Block grant for enforcement and treatment capacity

0+

arrests by CHP task force in 2025

But catch-and-release continues without Prop 36 funding

The Reality of Crime in California

The Governor claims fiscal responsibility. But the true cost of refusing to fund Prop 36 is measured in closed businesses, untreated addiction, and communities living in fear.

The Safety Deficit

California is not merely facing a fiscal deficit—it is facing a Safety Deficit that is actively eroding the tax base. Retail theft and organized crime contribute to billions in annual losses.

The cost of inaction far exceeds the cost of implementation.

Catch and Release Crisis

Despite 1,200+ arrests by CHP's Organized Retail Crime Task Force, retention rates remain abysmal. Offenders are cited and released within hours due to the misdemeanor cap on thefts under $950.

Sophisticated criminal enterprises are exploiting this loophole.

Communities Under Siege

Asian American and Latino small business owners bear the brunt of this lawlessness. From the Kim Hung Jewelry assault to the wave of taqueria robberies, minority-owned businesses are defenseless.

Refusing to fund Prop 36 abandons minority communities.

The Treatment Gap

Without Prop 36 funding, there are zero new treatment beds funded in the 2026 budget. The 'treatment-mandated felony' becomes an empty promise—no funding means no treatment, no diversion.

This makes the 'treatment mandate' a lie.

“By refusing to fund the mechanism that stops this hemorrhage, the Governor is engaging in false economy—saving millions while costing the state billions.”

— Coalition for Safe Communities & Voter Mandate

Crime Impact Across California

These are not abstract statistics. These are real incidents affecting real families and businesses—all in communities that voted overwhelmingly YES on Prop 36.

Case Study
Kim Hung Jewelry Assault
San JoseSeptember 5, 2025Violent Crime

10+ suspects rammed a vehicle into the store. 88-year-old owner physically assaulted during smash-and-grab robbery.

72%

Voted YES on Prop 36

in San Jose area

The victims aren't corporations—they are immigrant families who built their livelihoods serving their communities. Defunding Prop 36 abandons them.

The Coalition for Safe Communities

A bipartisan coalition too broad to dismiss as partisan and too vocal to ignore— uniting mayors, district attorneys, retailers, and victim advocates under one mission.

Political Leadership

MC

Mayor Carmen Montano

Chair, Coalition for Safe Communities

City of Milpitas

MM

Mayor Matt Mahan

Common Sense Coalition

City of San Jose

MB

Mayor Bobbie Singh-Allen

Common Sense Coalition

City of Elk Grove

Law Enforcement & Legal

JR

Jeff Rosen

District Attorney

Santa Clara County DA

CD

CA District Attorneys Association

Legal Engine

CDAA

Business & Commerce

RM

Rachel Michelin

President & CEO

California Retailers Association

EG

Elizabeth Graham

Executive Director

CA Fuels & Convenience Alliance

JC

Julian Canete

President & CEO

CA Hispanic Chambers of Commerce

Community & Advocacy

TN

Tuan Ngo

Community Leader

Asians Unite

GM

Gina McDonald

Advocate

Mothers Against Drug Addiction

Economic Justice

Protecting small businesses and the tax base that funds public services

Constitutional Compliance

Demanding the Governor faithfully execute voter-approved law

Treatment & Recovery

Funding treatment beds so the mandate actually helps those struggling with addiction

Legislator Accountability Tracker

Track where your representatives stand on funding the voter mandate. Contact those who remain undecided or opposed.

1

Support

6

Undecided

1

Oppose

Marie Alvarado-Gil

SenateJackson

R
Supports Funding

74% of their district voted YES on Prop 36

Josh Newman

SenateFullerton

D
Undecided

68% of their district voted YES on Prop 36

Dave Min

SenateIrvine

D
Undecided

71% of their district voted YES on Prop 36

Aisha Wahab

SenateFremont

D
Opposes / Silent

65% of their district voted YES on Prop 36

Cottie Petrie-Norris

AssemblyIrvine

D
Undecided

70% of their district voted YES on Prop 36

Jacqui Irwin

AssemblyThousand Oaks

D
Undecided

69% of their district voted YES on Prop 36

Blanca Rubio

AssemblyBaldwin Park

D
Undecided

67% of their district voted YES on Prop 36

James Ramos

AssemblySan Bernardino

D
Undecided

72% of their district voted YES on Prop 36

Want to see the full list of all California legislators?

Take Action Now

Democracy demands participation. Use these tools to make your voice heard and demand the Governor fund the will of the people.

Email the Governor
Send a pre-written letter demanding Prop 36 funding
Business Toolkit
Resources for small business owners
Spread the Word
Share this campaign with your network

Use hashtag #FundProp36 to join the conversation